Skip to main content

How to handle a cranky team member

Scenario:

You have been working on a team where a team member has been throwing tantrums on every decision made.

He has been involved in some of them but claims to not be engaged. He keeps complaining of not being kept in loop, does not react positively to feedback and generally shirks responsibility.

These are symptoms that something else is wrong.


How do you go about managing this scenario?




Start with the basic sanity questions:

  • Is the team member experienced?
  • Are you in a high stress work environment?
  • Are there enough safety outlets built into the daily work routines?
  • Does the team member have enough support to handle the current responsibility?
  • Does the team member have any personal challenges that they need help with?

Work on context specific questions:

  • Does the team member exhibit the behavior consistently?
  • Does the team member have any specific area of challenge?
  • Does the team member exhibit objective interest towards a specific area of work? Is that something that is attainable?
  • Does the team member have irrefutable facts that are being ignored all the time?
Work on a specific action plan and involve people - if needed

  • Work on the information available to engage with the person more objectively.
  • Work on having a broader picture - for every one to understand what is at stake and what is the context.
  • Work on clear direction towards what needs to be done in terms of now, next, later.
  • Get a confirmation that plan is acceptable by every one. Compromises does not work, consensus does.
  • Followup on the plan to get that to completion. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My Journey in Inquiry and Advocacy - An experience report

It is recently that I have consciously started practicing Inquiry. Let me explain. I am a consultant who constantly looks at the situation and comes up and implements the solution to progress from there. While I do that, I constantly use Inquiry as a means to progress - one of the key facilitation technique specifically in multiple stakeholder situations.

Principles for developing systems that are anti-fragile

I have been trying to make sense of what anti-fragility means and how do I use that in my day job. As a Business Principal, I tend to work with the abstract but orchestrate a program of work that needs details. This makes my job a little difficult in the terms of designing for more self-preserving systems that preserve the spirit of the abstracted strategy or vision. I came across an article from Daniel Russo on anti-fragility and his attempt at creating a manifesto similar to the manifesto for agile software development. For more reading on Daniel Russo, here is his profile:  http://djrusso.github.io More reading from his paper here:  https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050916302290 This post is an attempt for me to understand what goes into developing a program that uses every opportunity to strengthen itself and achieve its objective - the vision.  I liked the approach of principles for developing systems that are anti-fragile. It is a very valua

User Personas

User Personas are a very good tool for the product owners, business analysts or product managers to be able to co-create with designers. It is predominantly a product of the user research and should not be an amalgamation of demographic data. It is the best way for us to list all scenarios that a persona would take when they want to attain a goal. It is predominantly used to build empathy with user, focus the team and build consensus in a large diverse stakeholder group. The website I referred to is here:  https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2014/08/a-closer-look-at-personas-part-1/