Skip to main content

[Policy Making] Integration and Diversity

Policy Making is a very good instrument that any organization can use to communicate to its participants and help further the organization's goals.

Policy - in a nutshell - is the course of principle of action proposed by the organization or entity.

Why do we care

Consulting, in a lot of ways, has to deal with processes.

There are processes that as consultants, we need to be aware of and respect in our client organizations. There are processes that we have to work around and eventually suggest replacing or retiring.

All of these are a lot simpler if we understand policy making better.

Under what constraints or conditions was a specific policy made? Why is it still relevant?

There are many more questions that we need to ask as consultants.

Organizational structure and Policy Making






Policy making pushes through lot of desired changes and some undesired changes in the way the organizations structures itself. This is not the formal structure that can be documented, presented and analyzed upon later.

Policy Making helps provide a good lens to understand why organizations structure the way they are now.

One aspect of policy making that is one of my pet topics is Integration and diversity.

Integration and Diversity

There are several examples of organizations and countries following the basic tenet of integration. This principle has got at least 3-5 millenia of precedent to it.

It starts all the way back to the Egyptian empire, China to the latest examples of United Kingdom and USSR.

Integration helps in making sure that all parts of the organization - in this case civilization - have the same institutions and hence can make sense of policies in the same way. There are no second guesses and hence enforcement is easy.

However, Integration does not always work and is very costly. Diversity is often a better policy making instrument, though not apparent and most of the times counter-intuitive.

Take the example of a bigger organization acquiring the smaller organization. The managers often pursue the policy of integration and hence lose several key learning and other intangible assets of an organization.

This is true with countries as well. Any country that wants to expand uses integration as a policy making instrument rather than diversity.

The reason is because they lose sight of the longer term goal of an organization being a going-concern. They try to show immediate results for the actions they have taken that are more tangible but actually destructive in the longer run.


Conclusion

There are several policy making instruments that policy makers can use. The choice of instruments has historically been to show quick results and hence are not true to the real goals of policy making.

Why do they make these choices ?

Consultants learn and be aware of these scenarios when we are on a client assignment is very important to learn.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My Journey in Inquiry and Advocacy - An experience report

It is recently that I have consciously started practicing Inquiry. Let me explain. I am a consultant who constantly looks at the situation and comes up and implements the solution to progress from there. While I do that, I constantly use Inquiry as a means to progress - one of the key facilitation technique specifically in multiple stakeholder situations.

Principles for developing systems that are anti-fragile

I have been trying to make sense of what anti-fragility means and how do I use that in my day job. As a Business Principal, I tend to work with the abstract but orchestrate a program of work that needs details. This makes my job a little difficult in the terms of designing for more self-preserving systems that preserve the spirit of the abstracted strategy or vision. I came across an article from Daniel Russo on anti-fragility and his attempt at creating a manifesto similar to the manifesto for agile software development. For more reading on Daniel Russo, here is his profile:  http://djrusso.github.io More reading from his paper here:  https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050916302290 This post is an attempt for me to understand what goes into developing a program that uses every opportunity to strengthen itself and achieve its objective - the vision.  I liked the approach of principles for developing systems that are anti-fragile. It is a very valua

User Personas

User Personas are a very good tool for the product owners, business analysts or product managers to be able to co-create with designers. It is predominantly a product of the user research and should not be an amalgamation of demographic data. It is the best way for us to list all scenarios that a persona would take when they want to attain a goal. It is predominantly used to build empathy with user, focus the team and build consensus in a large diverse stakeholder group. The website I referred to is here:  https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2014/08/a-closer-look-at-personas-part-1/